The petition became infructuous because the impugned letter was modified by the Respondent-Railways, leaving nothing to survive in the petition, leading to its disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-wp-1886-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1886 OF 2017
Sandhya Gokhale and Others ...Petitioners vs. The Union of India and Others ...Respondents
Ms. Devyani Kulkarni i/b. Mr. Vinamra Kopariha, for the Petitioners
Ms. Rohini Wagh i/b. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR &
R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2017
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the
impugned letter dated 30th November, 2016 has been modified by the Respondent-Railways and as such nothing survives in this Petition.
(R.G.KETKAR, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Sandhya Gokhale and Others
The Union of India and Others
Shantanu Kemkar
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
