A single-judge bench dismissed a civil application arising from a disposed writ petition, holding that relief cannot be extended in a civil application when the underlying writ petition is disposed of.
Civil application dismissed with liberty to seek appropriate remedy available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sr.4.caw.2888.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2888 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10186 OF 2017
Service No.IC-4911K Colonel Pankaj Bhargava …Applicant
Versus
Union of India & ors.
…Respondents
Mr.Madhav U. Chavan for the applicant. Mr.Anil C. Singh, AGP a/w. Mr. D.P. Singh, Geetika Gandhi for the respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & R. G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 18 th DECEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
petition no.10186 of 2017. Relief claimed in the civil application cannot be extended in disposed of writ petition.
to seek appropriate remedy as may be available to him in accordance with law.
(R.G. KETKAR, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Vina k 1/1
Colonel Pankaj Bhargava
Union of India
SHANTANU S. KEMKAR
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
