A criminal writ petition seeking liberty to withdraw was allowed to be withdrawn. No substantive decision on merits was recorded.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905.wp-1835.17.doc
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1835 OF 2017
Jayesh Arjun Bhandari & Anr. … Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Rahul Singh i/b. Mithilesh S. Singh for the Petitioner. Mr. Rahul Gaikwad for the Intervenor. Mr. A.D. Khamkhedkar, APP, for the Respondent-State.
P.C.
When this matter is called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks liberty to withdraw this petition. On his application, petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
1/1
Jayesh Arjun Bhandari & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
P.C.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
