Allowed

Ravi Bharat Chavan through His Father Bharat Santu Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC29 Jun 2017APPLN/98/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for transfer of Juvenile Case No.311/2016 from Nashik to Mumbai under Section 407 CrPC. Court noted communal violence, vandalism of the applicant's home, and insufficient security at Nashik observation home. Transfer allowed to protect juvenile despite respondent's claim that law and order has normalized.

What did the court decide?

Juvenile Case No.311/2016 pending before Juvenile Justice Board, Nashik shall be transferred to Juvenile Justice Board, Mumbai City, Mumbai.

Ravi Bharat Chavan through His Father Bharat… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

23.appln.98.17.doc

¶2

sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2017

Ravi Bharat Chavan

… Applicant

vs.

The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶9

Ms. Mahararukh Adenwalla a/w Ms. Monica Sakhrani for the Applicant. Ms. N. S. Jain for the Respondent.

¶10

CORAM : A.K. MENON, J.

¶11

DATE : 29 th JUNE, 2017

¶12

P.C.

¶13

This application under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

¶14

seeks transfer of Juvenile Case no.311/2016 pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Nashik to the Juvenile Justice Board, Mumbai. The applicant

¶15

is a minor, hence the application is filed through his father and natural

¶16

guardian. The applicant is stated to be 15 years and 9 days on the date of the alleged offence. The offence is alleged to have taken place on 8 th October, 2016 at Talegaon, Anjaneri, District Nashik. FIR bearing C.R. No.102/2016 has been registered on 8th October, 2016 under Section 376

¶17

r/w Section12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The charge-sheet has been filed on 27th October, 2016.

¶18

It is the case of the applicant that the alleged incident led to communal violence between the communities involved and the situation was delicate for several days. The applicant has also stated that his home was

¶19

1/4

¶20

23.appln.98.17.doc

¶21

vandalized and burnt and the applicant's parents and siblings had to flee the village and have still not returned to village. The applicant has relied upon an order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Nashik on 9 th October, 2016 viz. on the very same date of the incident, copy of which appears at Exhibit A. By the said order the Juvenile Justice Board, Nashik observed that the juvenile applicant is not safe in Nashik since no security is provided at the local remand home and therefore it would be appropriate that the applicant was kept at Mumbai in the remand home at Umarkhadi till further orders. The applicant was thereafter shifted to Mumbai in view of the delicate situation prevailing in Nashik.

¶22

The respondent has meanwhile filed an affidavit in reply of the concerned officer. The reply dated 31st March, 2017 admits that the law and order situation in Nasik was adversely affected due to the reaction of the persons in the surrounding area and became more critical due to transmission of hate messages on social media. In fact the deponent states that mobile data services were discontinued for 6-7 days and due to the communal charged atmosphere in Nashik at the relevant time, 200 people were arrested. However, in the same reply it is stated that the situation has since come under control and from November 2016 till March 2017 no other incidents are reported. It is further stated that presently the law and order situation in Nasik is absolutely normal and the apprehension expressed are false. This application for transfer is opposed for the aforesaid reasons.

¶23

An affidavit in rejoinder is filed on behalf of the applicant wherein the

¶24

2/4

¶25

23.appln.98.17.doc

¶26

contents of the reply have been refuted. The rejoinder further sets out the intensity with which the mob had behaved immediately after the incident. The mob was targeting men and women of the community to which the applicant belong and houses were also allegedly destroyed. The applicant and his family therefore reiterated the contents of the application.

¶27

Having considered the pleadings as well as the documents on record, I find that the order of transfer passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Nashik was on the basis of a communication dated 9th October, 2016 appearing at Exhibit 'A'. Furthermore, the deponent of the affidavit in reply had also supported the transfer of the Juvenile in conflict with law made at the material time as is evident from the communication addressed to the Juvenile Justice Board on 9th October, 2016 copy of which appears at Exhibit M. The contention of the affidavit in reply that presently the situation in Nashik is normal and that there is no risk of any kind to the applicant cannot be accepted for the simple reason that the applicant was transferred to Mumbai immediately after the alleged incident and the situation have quietened down.

¶28

However, rejecting this application would entail the applicant being shifted back to Nashik. Admittedly, security arrangements were insufficient at Nashik Observation Home. That apart even assuming, security arrangement are provided at the observation home in Nashik, it would not in my view be sufficient to protect the applicant against any mob should the issue flare up. Considering the facts of the case, I am inclined to allow

¶29

3/4

¶30

23.appln.98.17.doc

¶31

this application. Accordingly, I pass the following order:-

¶32

(i) Application is allowed, Juvenile Case No.311/2016 pending before Juvenile Justice Board, Nashik shall be transferred to Mumbai.

¶33

(ii) Record and Proceedings of Juvenile Case no.311/2016 pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Nashik, shall forthwith be transferred to the Juvenile Justice Board, Mumbai City, Mumbai.

¶34

(iii) Application is disposed of in the above terms.

¶35

(iv) No orders as to costs.

¶36

(v) Learned APP to immediately take steps to inform the authorities in Nashik of the passing of this order.

¶37

4/4

Ravi Bharat Chavan through His Father Bharat Santu Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Bharat Chavan through His Father Bharat Santu Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Antim Bhagwandas Totla Vs the State of Maharashtraa and Anr.

Vinod Ashok Bhoite Vs Akshara Vinod Bhoite and Anr.

Lilesh Suryakant Kalsekar Vs Shobha Pol and Anr.

M/S. Aditya Enterprises through Prop. Adity Tejas Patel Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Jayesh Arjun Bhandari and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Devendra Babulal Rao Vs Shaikh Salim Jamil Ahmed and Anr.