The petitioner's term as elected representative expired. Due to the interim order extending his tenure, the court held that nothing survived for further consideration after a long passage of time and disposed of the petition by discharging the rule.
Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2008
Shri Nagsen Hiraman Malave .. Petitioner Vs.
The Returning Officer, Grampanchayat, Kisal, Tal. Murbad, Dist. Thane & ors. .. Respondents
Mr. A.A. Garge for the petitioner.
Mr. S.D. Rairikar, AGP for respondent No.2.
CORAM : M.S. KARNIK, J.
DATED : 1st NOVEMBER, 2017
ORDER :
Since the term for which the petitioner was elected is already over and he has continued as an elected representative by virtue of the interim order passed by this Court. In view of the passage of time, nothing survives for further consideration. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
1/1
Shri Nagsen Hiraman Malave
The Returning Officer, Grampanchayat, Kisal
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
