Dismissed
Anant Ganpat Shirwalkar v. Murlidhar Yashwant Rane and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/8178/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8178 OF 2016
Anant Ganpat Shirwalkar .. Petitioner Vs. Murlidhar Yashwant Rane and anr. .. Respondents
Mrs.Prabha Badadare, for the Petitioner. None for Respondents.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2017
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the Petition
has become infructuous.
In view of statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Anant Ganpat Shirwalkar
Murlidhar Yashwant Rane
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court