Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition No. 1728 of 2006 before the High Court at Aurangabad. Counsel requested leave to withdraw and the Lok Adalat was scheduled.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn; Rule discharged with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1728.06.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1728 OF 2006
Ramanand s/o Nanakramji Ladda .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. R.R. Totla, advocate holding for Mr. R.F. Totla, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for the State.
Mr. M.M.Joshi, advocate for respondent no. 2.
Mr. S.B. Ghatol Patil, advocate for respondents 1 and 3.
=====
CORAM : S. B. SHUKRE, J. DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2017.
PER COURT :
dyb
Ramanand s/o Nanakramji Ladda
The State of Maharashtra
S. B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
