A brief interim order directing notice to one respondent while skipping another uncontested party, without substantive reasoning or legal proposition.
Notice to Respondent No. 2 for final disposal. No notice to Respondent No. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp396.17.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.396 OF 2017
Sundarrao s/o Munjaji Shinde
Petitioner
Versus
Sow.Gangasagar w/o Annasaheb Labade and another
Respondents
Mr.S.S.Gangakhedkar, advocate for the petitioner Mr.Jitendra Vasare, advocate holding for Mr.S.B.Gothwal, advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.B.SHUKRE, J. DATE : 08th February, 2017
PER COURT:
Issue notice to Respondent No.2 for final disposal of the matter at the stage of admission. There is no need to issue notice to Respondent No.1 as she is not the contesting party, which is agreed to by learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as for Respondent No.2.
Put up at 02.30 p.m. today.
S.B.SHUKRE JUDGE
adb/wp396.17
Sundarrao s/o Munjaji Shinde
Sow.Gangasagar w/o Annasaheb Labade
Another
S.B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
