Petitioned for reduction of release period under premature release guidelines. Court upheld category 4(e) placement for murder with exceptional violence. Dismissed petition.
Rule discharged; no reduction in release period granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.1441/2017(908)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1441 OF 2017
Ismail @ Salim@ Javed Yusuf Shaikh Vs. The State of Maharashtra
...Petitioner ...Respondent
Ms. Rohini Dandekar, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner
Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED :21ST APRIL, 2017
P.C. :
learned Adhoc District Judge - III and Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai the Petitioner has been convicted under Section 302 r.w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions Case No.704 of
dated 14th June 2013 the Appeal came to be dismissed.
WP.1441/2017(908)
2
WP.1441/2017(908)
3
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's placement under category 4(e) of the 2010 Guidelines for premature release requires reduction given the exceptional violence/brutality of the murder.
Ismail @ Salim@ Javed Yusuf Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
