High Court granted parole to petitioner for 30 days. The court considered his wife's medical condition and his good prison conduct despite a previous parole violation, noting he surrendered voluntarily.
Parole granted for a period of 30 days on usual terms and conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2. cri wp 1141-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1141 OF 2017
Zakir Ahmed Shakir Ahmed Khan
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Rahul Arote | Advocate for the Petitioner |
| Mrs. G.P. Mulekar | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 20, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
APP for the State.
18.12.2014 on the ground of illness of his wife. The said
application was rejected by order dated 6.8.2015. Being
aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal. The
appeal was dismissed by order dated 21.11.2016, hence, this
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 3
2. cri wp 1141-17.doc
petition.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 3
2. cri wp 1141-17.doc
though after a delay of 33 days and looking to the fact that the conduct of the petitioner in prison is stated to be good,
on humanitarian ground, we are inclined to grant parole to
the petitioner for a period of 30 days on usual terms and
conditions as set out by the Competent Authority.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner should be granted parole on humanitarian grounds considering his prison conduct and wife's illness.
Zakir Ahmed Shakir Ahmed Khan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
