The court issued a direction to the respondent authority to decide on the petitioners appointment proposal within four months and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to decide on the proposal within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp14143.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.14143 OF 2017
Bhupesh s/o Kailash Shinde
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. A.D. Pawar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondents 1 and 2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ. DATE : 7th DECEMBER, 2017
PER COURT:
This petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to respondent no. 2 to take decision on the proposal tendered by respondent no. 3 - institution seeking approval to the appointment of petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from today and, it is accordingly directed.
Writ petition stands disposed of.
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the appointment authority to decide on a proposal for the petitioner's appointment within a specific timeframe.
Bhupesh s/o Kailash Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
The Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
R.M.Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
