This writ petition was disposed of summarily as it was presented at a premature stage given the availability of an alternate remedy to challenge the final outcome. No substantive decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 13995-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.13995 OF 2017
M/s. M. L. Zawar Through Its Partners and ...Petitioners another
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Mr. V. S. Bedre, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for respondents No.1 to 3/ State
CORAM : R. M. BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ. DATE : 06-12-2017
PER COURT :
law, open to the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of.
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE
vjg/-.
M/s. M. L. Zawar Through Its Partners
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
