The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the exclusion of widows of deceased freedom fighters from the definition of 'special class teachers' in a Government Resolution. The court found no logic in the arguments and held no interference was called for.
Petition dismissed as devoid of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
910 WRIT PETITION NO. 9942 OF 2017
APPASAHEB BABURAO SHINDE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A.V. Ambetkar AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.B. Yawalkar
Advocate for Respondents No.6 & 7 :Mr. P.R. Nangare
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ. Date: December 05, 2017
PER COURT :-
2 There is no logic or rationale in the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner for inclusion of the category of widows of the deceased freedom fighter in the definition provided at Sr.No.8-C of the Government resolution dated 27.2.2017 in respect of special class teachers Part-I.
( VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Government Resolution defining 'special class teachers' on the grounds that it omits widows of deceased freedom fighters.
Whether the writ petition challenging the classification of widows of deceased freedom fighters has any logical or substantive merit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaReferred¶9
APPASAHEB BABURAO SHINDE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
