The High Court disposed of the writ petition without granting or denying relief, keeping the petitioner's option to avail of other legal remedies open. No substantive ruling was made on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
938 WRIT PETITION NO. 13569 OF 2017
SHREE SALES CORPORATION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NANDKISHOR SUKHDEO RAJURKAR
VERSUS
THE CHIEF OFFICER MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KOPARGAON
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.B. Joshi
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ. Date: November 22, 2017
PER COURT :-
1 It would be open for the petitioner to avail of remedies available in law.
( VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
SHREE SALES CORPORATION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NANDKISHOR SUKHDEO RAJURKAR
THE CHIEF OFFICER MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KOPARGAON
R. M. BORDE
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
