Mr. Amin Khan., Vs the Margao Municipal Council, Thr. Its Chief Officer.

¶1

1

¶2

Wp 1179 2016

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1179 OF 2016

¶5

Mr. Amin Khan, Son of Munawar Khan, Major of age, Occupation-business, Partner M/s. Khan & Co., Partnership Firm, With Office at Khyber Hotel, Katkar Building, Old Station Road, Margao, Goa. …. Petitioner Orig. Appellant

¶6

V e r s u s

¶7

The Margao Municipal Council, Through its Chief Officer, With Office at Municipal Building, Margao, Goa. ….. Respondent

¶8

All the above addresses are the registered addresses of the parties.

¶9

Mr. Usgaonkar Sudesh Manohar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Parag S. Rao, Advocate for Respondent.

¶11

Coram:- C. V. BHADANG, J. Date:- 14th February, 2017.

¶12

ORAL JUDGMENT:

¶13

Rule, made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel for

¶14

the respondent waives service. Heard finally by consent of

2

Wp 1179 2016

parties.

The petitioner is challenging the final demolition notice which has been confirmed by the Municipalities Appellate Tribunal. The contention is that the petitioner was not heard before the issuance of the notice. Shri Rao, the learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions from Shri Suhas Faldesai, Junior Engineer, who is present before the Court states that respondent no.1 shall withdraw the impugned notice and shall pass fresh orders after hearing the petitioner in accordance with law. The statement is accepted. In such circumstances, the following order is passed by consent of parties:

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

(i) The petition is partly allowed. The impugned order

¶21

dated 15/11/2016 is hereby set aside.

¶22

(ii) The respondent shall pass a fresh order after granting opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and pass a fresh order in accordance with law.

¶23

3

¶24

Wp 1179 2016

¶25

(iii) Rule is made partly absolute in the aforesaid terms, with

¶26

no order as to costs.

¶27

C. V. BHADANG, J.

¶28

ap/-

Mr. Amin Khan., v. the Margao Municipal Council, Thr. Its Chief Officer.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Amin Khan., v. the Margao Municipal Council, Thr. Its Chief Officer.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Putu Rabhoba Pagi and 2 Ors., Vs White Raj Resorts Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Aut. Officer Stephan Vornokov and 2 Ors.

Shri. Kushal Puri, Presently Lodged in Colvale Jail., Vs State of Goa, as Rep. by the Officer in Charge, Pernem Police Station, Pernem and Anr.

Mr. Joseph Justin Gonsalves. Vs Shri. Gokuldas Savlo Naik and 10 Ors.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mormugao, Rep. by Constituted Attorney, Mrs. Hemangi Arsekar Vs M/S. Vishal Infrastructure Ltd.

Maria Antoneta Fernandes., Vs Mr. Valerian Sebastian Rodrigues.

Mr. Deepak Luthria, Presently Lodged in Judicial Custody at Sada, Vasco., Vs State, Thr. P.I. Attached to Calangute Police Station and Anr.