Application for bail withdrawn by the applicant who was facing prosecution under Section 302 IPC. The Court disposed of the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL APPLICATION ( BAIL ) NO. 51 OF 2017
MR. DEEPAK LUTHRIA, PRESENTLY LODGED IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY AT SADA, VASCO., ... Applicant Versus STATE, THR. P.I. ATTACHED TO CALANGUTE POLICE STATION AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. Wilbur Menezes, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. P. Faldessai, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:14th February, 2017
P.C.
This is an application for bail. The applicant is facing prosecution for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (I.P.C., for short). The application for bail was earlier rejected by the learned Sessions Judge and the applicant had approached this Court for bail and that application for bail was withdrawn. Subsequently, the trial has proceeded and it is undisputed that it is nearing conclusion as the Investigating Officer only is remained to be examined. In such circumstances, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal Application (Bail).
CRMAB/51/2017
2
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
MR. DEEPAK LUTHRIA
STATE, THR. P.I. ATTACHED TO CALANGUTE POLICE STATION
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
