The High Court at Aurangabad granted the petitioner's application to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate authorities for redressal and disposed of the writ accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 11557-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11557 OF 2017
Tatya Navnath Waghire
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Mr. Y. K. Bobade, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for respondents No.1 to 3/ State
CORAM : R. M. BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ. DATE : 13-11-2017
PER COURT :
leave to withdraw writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available in law, for redressal of his grievance.
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE
vjg/-.
Tatya Navnath Waghire
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
