A contempt petition challenging compliance of a direction was disposed of as the purpose of the petition was satisfied upon the respondent stating that remaining directions would be complied with within three months.
The contempt petition was disposed of and earlier notices against the respondents were discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CP 216-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 216 OF 2017
Arun Bhagwanrao Khardekar and Others ...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Mr. S. M. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for the respondents No.1 to 3/State Mr. S. D. Hiwrekar, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5
CORAM : R. M. BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ. DATE : 13-11-2017
PER COURT :
2 CP 216-2017
by this court will be complied with within a period of three (3) months from today.
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE
vjg/-.
Arun Bhagwanrao Khardekar and Others
The State of Maharashtra
other
respondents No.4 and 5
respondents No.1 to 3/State
R. M. BORDE
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
