The petitioner sought quashing of an Cr.P.C. Section 149 notice. The public prosecutor stated that the notice would be withdrawn. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.
Petition disposed of on the statement of withdrawal of the impugned notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35 wp 1142-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1142 of 2017
Goldie Sud .. Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Goldie Sud, Petitioner is present in person. Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 6th APRIL, 2017.
P.C. :
aside the notice dated 13th June, 2016 issued against the Petitioner under Section 149 of Cr.P.C.
Court, states that the notice under challenge will be withdrawn. She has also placed on record the communication dated 6th April, 2017 by
the Senior Inspector of Police, Khar Police Station. The
1 of 2
salgaonkar
35 wp 1142-17.doc
communication is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
grievance of the petitioner no more survives. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
2 of 2
salgaonkar
Goldie Sud
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
