Court rejected bail application of applicant, original accused No.2, during pendency of criminal appeal for murder. He was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment based on corroborated eyewitness and medical evidence.
Bail application dismissed; applicant not released.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 15_appa_157_2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.157 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.249 OF 2016
Ashok Malka Atkare ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. U.R. Agandsurve for the Applicant. Ms S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 6th APRIL, 2017.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned
APP for the Respondent -State.
Megha
1/2
Megha 15_appa_157_2017.doc
due to haemorrhajic shock with injury to vital organs. He has stated that all injuries are possible by the muddemal-sickle. Thus, medical evidence corroborates the evidence of PW-5 and PW-6.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be released on bail during the pendency of the criminal appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Malka Atkare
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
