The petitioner sought permission to withdraw Writ Petition No. 101 of 2017, hearing concluded, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 101 OF 2017
SHRI. RAJARAM GIRI NAIK., ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THR. THE SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Mr. Vilas P. Thali, Advocate for the petitioner.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:27th January, 2017
P.C.
Heard Shri Thali, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, for some time. the learned Counsel, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Needless to mention that this Court has not examined the merits of the matter,
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
SHRI. RAJARAM GIRI NAIK.
STATE OF GOA, THR. THE SECRETARY AND 2 ORS.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
