The applicant filed a Misc. Civil Application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 9 of 2012. By consent of parties and for specified reasons, the High Court allowed the application and restored the writ petition to file.
Misc. Civil Application allowed; Writ Petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9 OF 2012
... Applicant
SHRI. JOSE D'SA., ... Applicant Versus SHRI. BENINO DA SILVA REBEIRO (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. Raunaq Rao, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. G. Agni, Advocate for respondents.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:24th January, 2017
P.C.
Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel for the respondents.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition restoring to file should be allowed by consent.
Whether Misc. Civil Application No. 66 of 2017 should be decided.
SHRI. JOSE D'SA.
SHRI. BENINO DA SILVA REBEIRO (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
