This order records the abatement of a testamentary suit and interpleader petition because the plaintiff failed to take steps after intimation of the defendant's death.
Suit abated qua deceased defendant; office directed to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TS102_10.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.102 OF 2010
IN
PETITION NO.102 OF 2009
| Kashinath Sadashiv Gudde | … | Deceased |
|---|---|---|
| Geeta Deepak Kanekar | … | Plaintiff / Petitioner |
| Vs. | ||
| Ashok Kashinath Gudde | … | Caveator |
Mr. Yatin Malvankar i/b. Mr. Mandar Limaye for Plaintiff. Mr. G. S. Hiranandani for Caveator.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2017
P.C. :
Heard Mr. Malvankar, learned Counsel for the plaintiff and Mr. Hiranandani, learned Counsel for caveator.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.)
Minal Parab
1/1
Geeta Deepak Kanekar
Ashok Kashinath Gudde
R. G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
