A thin order wherein the High Court of Bombay, via the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction Chamber, allowed the applicant's prayer for specific amendments to the schedule in a testamentary suit pending before the Hon'ble Court.
Chamber Summons allowed; amendments to Schedule-1 carried out within two weeks; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CST95_17.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.95 OF 2017
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.138 OF 2015 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.67 OF 2015
| Jayashree Jayant Salgaonkar | … | Deceased |
|---|---|---|
| Umesh Govind Mantri | … | Applicant / Plaintiff |
| In the matter between | ||
| Umesh Govind Mantri | … | Plaintiff |
| Vs. | ||
| Jayraj Jayant Salgaonkar and another | … | Defendants |
Mr. Gaurav Mehta i/b. Mr. N. Kotwal for Applicant. Mr. R. V. Pai i/b. Ms Bina R. Pai for Defendants.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2017
P.C. :
Heard Mr. Mehta, learned Counsel for applicant and Mr. Pai, learned Counsel for defendants.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.)
Minal Parab
1/1
Umesh Govind Mantri
Jayraj Jayant Salgaonkar
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
