An application seeking amendment to record subsequent events in a writ petition was allowed, keeping all defenses open including preliminary objections before disposing of the matter.
Amendment allowed with defenses kept open; parties to act on certified copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 141 OF 2017
MR. RAVINDRA PRAKASH., ... Applicant Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, DRI AND 7 ORS., ... Respondents
Shri S.D.Padiyar with Shri P. Karpe, Advocates for the applicant. Shri Mahesh Amonkar, AGA for the respondent no.1. Shri C.A. Ferreira, Advocate for respondents no.7 and 8.
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date:17th March, 2017
ORDER
The application is filed for amendment to bring on record the subsequent events including passing of the order passed by the concerned Authority. At this stage, by keeping all defence open including the preliminary objection, amendment is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
mukund
MR. RAVINDRA PRAKASH.
DIRECTOR GENERAL, DRI
ANOOP V. MOHTA
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
