This court rejected a review petition, holding that no error was apparent on the face of the record in the impugned order, and thus no case was made out for exercising review jurisdiction.
The Review Petition is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(5)-RPWL-47-17.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.47 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.35 OF 2015
Union of India through Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs (Budget Division) North Block, New Delhi and others
..Review Petitioners
Versus Devendra P. Thakkar and another ..Respondents
Mr. D. P. Singh for the Review Petitioners. Mr. Suraj Iyer a/w Ms. Debashree Mandpe i/by M/s. Ganesh & Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : 24th NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.
2] There is no error apparent on the face of record in the order
under review. No case is therefore made out for exercising review jurisdiction. The Review Petition is rejected.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]
1 of 1
BGP.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the impugned order warranting the exercise of review jurisdiction.
Union of India through Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs (Budget Division) North Block, New Delhi and others
Devendra P. Thakkar
B. R. Gavai
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
