Dismissed
Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. v. United Commercial Bank and 12 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1487/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1488-10, 1444-11 VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pc-WP. 1487-10, 1488-10, 1444-11
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1487 OF 2010
Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Versus United Commercial Bank & Ors. … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION No. 1488 OF 2010
Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Versus United Commercial Bank & Ors. … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION No. 1444 OF 2011
Premnarayan Harinarayanji Lakhani … Petitioner Versus Everest Fincap Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents
***
Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Counsel a/w Pravin Samdhani, Sr. Counsel, a/w S. U. Kamdar, Sr. Counsel, Dhawal J. Mehta, Swapnil Khatri, Chirag Kamdar, Krishna Moorthy, Abilash Pradhan, Amogh Singh i/b M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Petitioner in WP. 1487/2010, 1488/2010 and for Respondent No. 1 in WP. 1444/2011.
Mr. S. S. Dube a/w Nagendra Dube, for the Respondent No. 1.
Mr. J. P. Cama, Sr. Counsel a/w Gautam Mehta, Devanshu P. Desai, for Respondent No. 2 in WP. 1444/2011.
1 / 2
pc-WP. 1487-10, 1488-10, 1444-11
Mr. Prasad Dani, Sr. Counsel a/w Bidan Chandran, Ms. Sarojini Patil i/b Ms. Poonam Utekar, for Respondent No. 3.
Ms. Pooja Batra i/b M/s. Bodhanwalla & Co. for Respondent No. 4. Ms. Pooja Kshirsagar Wagle, for Respondent Nos. 5 to 9.
Mr. Girish Godbole, Sr. Counsel a/w Karl Shroff, Bimal Bhabhda, for Respondent No. 10.
Mr. B. B. Parekar a/w Dr. Deepti Mukesh for Official Liquidator for Respondent No. 16.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON : AUGUST 4, 2017 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : AUGUST 28 , 2017 PC.
In the light of the view taken by us while recording reasons in the judgment passed in Writ Petition No. 2509 of 2008 of even date, we find no merit in the present petitions. All the three writ petitions are therefore, dismissed.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No. 2509 of 2008Referred¶26
Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd.
United Commercial Bank
Premnarayan Harinarayanji Lakhani
Everest Fincap Ltd.
B. R. GAVAI
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court