Review petition dismissed ex parte for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner, who was previously indulged on two prior dates before the order.
None; petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.8 OF 2017 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4065 OF 2016 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1392 OF 2010
Morris Benny Kinny, Malad, Mumbai .… Petitioner In the matter between Valerian Anthony Ferreira …. Appellant V/s. Gangaram Jethiya Bhandari & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Kunal Cheda, i/by M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mangesh S. Parte, i/by M/s. Deepak Chitnis-Chiparikar & Co., for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATE : 15 TH DECEMBER 2017.
P.C. :
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
1/1
RPF-8-17.doc
Morris Benny Kinny
Valerian Anthony Ferreira
Gangaram Jethiya Bhandari
SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
