The applicant voluntarily withdrew the criminal revision application and the associated bail application filed therein. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on January 12, 2017, without adjudication on merits or substantive legal principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(908)REVNNo.5722016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.697 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.672 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.672 OF 2016
Shailesh Surendra Parulekar ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Nitin Jadhav h/f. Kishor Shriram, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR J.
DATED : 12th JANUARY 2017.
P.C . :
1 Mr.Nitin Jadhav h/f. Kishor Shriram the learned counsel for the revisional petitioner/original accused on instructions submits that his client do not want to prosecute the revision petition as well as bail application filed therein and wants to withdraw the same.
2 In this view of the statement made on instruction by the learned counsel appearing for the revisional petitioner, the
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(908)REVNNo.5722016
revision petition as well as application for suspension and releasing the revisional petitioner on bail are disposed of as withdrawn.
(A. M. BADAR J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Shailesh Surendra Parulekar
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
