Allowed

Gajendra Rajaram Nimbalkar v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC11 Jan 2017APPA/1572/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal application pending appeal, the Bombay High Court allowed the appellant's request to suspend his substantive sentence and release him on bail, noting that the trial court had already suspended the sentence and the fine was deposited. The court directed him to execute a PR Bond and furnish surety.

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence suspended; applicant released on bail upon executing PR Bond of Rs.15,000/- and furnishing surety.

Gajendra Rajaram Nimbalkar Vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

12-APPA-1572-2016.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1572 OF 2016 IN

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.828 OF 2016

¶5

Mr. Gajendra Rajaram Nimbalkar )...Applicant

¶6

V/s. State OF Maharashtra )...Respondent

¶7

Mr. Vijay N. Shingnapurkar, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶8

Ms. A.A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

¶9

CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 11^th JANUARY 2017.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

This is an application for suspension of sentence and

¶12

releasing the applicant-accused on bail during the pendency of the appeal.

¶13

2 Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicantaccused. He submitted that sentence imposed upon the applicant-

¶14

accused is already suspended and he has already deposited fine amount before the trial Court.

¶15

Shivgan 1/3

¶16

12-APPA-1572-2016.doc

¶17

3 The learned APP opposed the application by

¶18

contending that offence is proved against the applicant-accused.

¶19

4 Perused the impugned judgment and order recording conviction of the applicant-accused for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the IPC. He is sentenced to suffer RI for two years with direction to pay fine amount of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo further RI for three months. Applicant-accused is further acquitted of the offence punishable under Sections 307, 326, 504 and 506 of IPC.

¶20

5 Sentence imposed upon the applicant-accused is short sentence, which is already suspended by the learned trial Court. In this view of the matter, applicant-accused deserves liberty. Hence, the following order:

¶21

(1) Application is allowed.

¶22

(2) Substantive sentence of imprisonment

¶23

imposed upon the applicant-accused is

¶24

suspended and he is directed to be released on

¶25

Shivgan 2/3

¶26

12-APPA-1572-2016.doc

¶27

bail on executing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- and on

¶28

furnishing surety in the like amount.

¶29

6 Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶30

(A. M. BADAR, J.)

¶31

Shivgan 3/3

Gajendra Rajaram Nimbalkar v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajendra Rajaram Nimbalkar v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asif Raza Khan Vs Mansingh Mahavir Nayak and Anr.

Vikrant @ Vicky Vijay Nikam Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sampat Bhausaheb Kharpude Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sambhaji Shamrao Londhe Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Ganpati Ramchadra Kumbhar

Vilas Vishnu Patil Vs Shrikant Shivajirao Patil and Anr.