Criminal revision application was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the framing of charge. No trial concluded.
Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order framing charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
revn.43.17.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2017
Vinod Chandulal Shah ...Applicant
Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Sagar Sheth a/w Ms. Nikita Hinger I/b Ms. Rinku S. Valanju for the Applicant
Mr. Omprakash Jha for the Respondent No. 1
Mr. H. J. Dedia, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State
CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. WEDNESDAY, 22nd MARCH, 2017
P.C.
pendency of this application, charge was framed as against the applicant and others by the trial Court. He therefore seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to challenge the order framing charge.
challenge the same, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
SQ Pathan
Vinod Chandulal Shah
Securities and Exchange Board of India
State
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
