The applicant sought an order to take up the issue of maintainability of a leave-to-file-appeal application before condonation of delay. Held infructuous, as delay was already condoned. Applicant to raise the issue when leave for appeal is taken up for admission.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34-appa.69.2017
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 69 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.427 OF 2015
Lalitkumar Dangi ...Applicant (Orig.Resp.No.3)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Bhairav Enterprises ...Applicant (Orig. Applicant) Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.A.K.Maheshwari, for the Applicant.
Mr.J.S.Kini i/b Mr.Suresh Dubey, for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. H. J. Dedia, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.
DATE : 21st MARCH, 2017
P.C. :
prayer:-
a) Before taking up the Application for condonation of delay, being Cr. Application No.427 of 2015, the issue of maintainability of the Application for Leave to file
34-appa.69.2017
2/2
Appeal in the above matter be taken up and be decided.
infructuous.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Lalitkumar Dangi
Bhairav Enterprises
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
