In criminal revision application No. 123 of 2016, the court allowed the withdrawal of the application as the impugned order requiring detention had become inoperative due to the expiration of the detention period.
Permission to withdraw the criminal revision application is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9.revn-123.16.doc
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2016
Kajal Sumar Biswas … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Pracheta Rathod h/f Arun Rajput for the Applicant. Ms. N.S. Jain, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 17 th JULY, 2017
P.C.
(ii) No orders as to costs.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
1/1
Kajal Sumar Biswas
The State of Maharashtra
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
