The applicant failed to appear in person or through counsel at multiple hearings despite being given a last chance to serve the respondent. The court found the applicant uninterested in pursuing the matter and dismissed the application.
Application dismissed for lack of prosecution by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.appp-2.13.doc
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2013
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7501 OF 2005
Jasbir Singh Seroy … Applicant vs. Chandraprakash Rai & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr. S.V.Gavand, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 17 th JULY, 2017
P.C.
(ii) In view of the disposal of the application no.7501 of 2005, application no.2 of
2013 which seeks restoration of the Criminal Application no.7501 of 2005 is also dismissed.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal application has to be dismissed in view of the non-appearance of the applicant.
Jasbir Singh Seroy
Chandraprakash Rai
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
