The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad permitted withdrawal of PIL No. 97 of 2017. The deposited sum was ordered to be refunded to the petitioners.
Leave to withdraw the PIL granted with liberty to file separate PILs; security deposit refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil97.17.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 97 OF 2017
Mahendrasingh Premsing Jadhav & another
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. L.S. Mahajan, advocate for petitioners. Mr. A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 3.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ. DATE : 10th NOVEMBER, 2017
PER COURT:
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation with liberty to file separate Public Interest Litigation in respect of each cause of action.
Leave granted. Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Since the Public Interest Litigation being permitted to be withdrawn, the amount deposited by the petitioners in the court shall be refunded to them.
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb
Mahendrasingh Premsing Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
