The petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition diary entry.
Leave to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh petition; Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-pill-112-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.112 OF 2017
Sushma Kailash Dubey
...Petitioner
vs.
The Chief Executive Officer, SRA and Others ...Respondents
Mr. R.R. Salvi a/w. Ms. Suvarna Talgote, for the Petitioner Mr. S.P. Thakkar, for the Respondent No.1. Ms. Pooja Yadav a/w. Mr. Sagar Patil, for Respondent-MCGM.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR &
R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2017
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw this Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition.
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Sushma Kailash Dubey
The Chief Executive Officer, SRA and Others
Shantanu Kemkar
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
