Petitioner seeking to withdraw a non-maintainable public interest litigation PIL in deference to Registry report and instructions to adopt appropriate remedy.
PIL disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PILST 29767-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST) NO. 29767 OF 2015
Shri Jitendra P. Maru V/s Administrator of Daman, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Ors.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr. Manoj Badgujar for the petitioner.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER 2017
P.C.:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has perused the report put up by the Registry stating that the public interest litigation is not maintainable. He further submits on instructions that in deference to the report of the Registry, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the PIL in order to adopt appropriate remedy.
The PIL is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as
above.
(N.M. JAMDAR, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE
1 of 1
ABS
Shri Jitendra P. Maru
Administrator of Daman, Dadra & Nagar Haveli
Dr. Manjula Chellur
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
