This order allowed the civil application per prayer clause (a) without a substantive headnote or summary, fixing compliance timelines.
Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. Additional reply to be filed within four weeks thereafter. State of possessions for six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)CAW 2072-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2072 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4804 OF 2016
Shri Kisan Bacharam Kharade & Ors.
.. Applicants/
Orig.petitioners
V/s
The Divisional Commissioner, Pune & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Dilip Bodake for the petitioners/applicants. Mr.Vikas Mali, AGP for the State.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ. & N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 29th AUGUST 2017
P.C.:
3 Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
(N.M. JAMDAR, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE
1 of 1
Tilak
Shri Kisan Bacharam Kharade & Ors.
The Divisional Commissioner, Pune & Ors.
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
