Ashok Laxmanrao Dake v. the State of Maharshtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
18 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 69 OF 2013
ASHOK LAXMANRAO DAKE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Surve Hemant AGP for Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar Advocate for Respondent 5 : Mr. Sagar Killarikar
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATED : August 7, 2017.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for parties submit that this
petition has rendered infructuous.
[N.W. SAMBRE, J.] [SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.]
ssc/
Ashok Laxmanrao Dake
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court