Public Interest Litigation dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner and counsel were absent on the day of hearing.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution reserving right to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PILL/18/2017
BDPSPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATINO (L) NO.18 OF 2017
Milind Yavatkar
…. Petitioner.
V/s
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
….. Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhay Patki, Addl. G.P. for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Ms, Trupti Puranik for the Corporation.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE: 3rd August, 2017
P.C.:-
1] For quite sometime, Petitioner is not attending to the directions given by this Court. He was also not present on earlier occasions. Today also, neither the Petitioner nor his advocate is present.
2] Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution for the present, reserving the right to the Petitioner to revive the Petition if he intends to pursue the matter.
(N.M. JAMDAR, J. ) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Milind Yavatkar
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
