Ex-parte hearing in a PIL regarding pension benefits. Court directed petitioner to deposit Rs. 50,000 as bonafides to proceed with admission; non-deposit would result in automatic disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL St-5739-17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION STAMP NO. 5739 OF 2017
Vipul Somnath Patne ...PETITIONER
versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. M.D. Narwadkar, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.G. Girase, GP for Respondent - State
.... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 27th FEBRUARY, 2017.
ORDER:
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.]
MTK
Vipul Somnath Patne
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
