This High Court of Bombay order condones a 162-day delay in filing a review petition and makes the notice of motion absolute before disposing of the matter.
The delay in filing the review petition was condoned for 162 days, and the notice of motion was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-NMW.328.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 328 OF 2017 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 5 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1355 OF 2014
Radhakrishna Co-operative } Housing Society Limited } and Anr. } Applicants in thematter of Radhakrishna Co-operative } Housing Society Limited } and Anr. } Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Prakash Seksaria with Ms. Kausar Banatwala, Ms. Flora Jain i/b. Mr. Tushar Goradia for the applicants.
Ms. Aparna Murlidharan i/b. Mr. P. G. Lad for respondent nos. 2 to 4.
Mr. H. C. Pimple for respondent no. 5.
Mr. Raju Morey with Mr. Sagar Rane for respondent no. 6.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATED :- OCTOBER 5, 2017
P.C. :-
Having heard both sides and finding that there is sufficient cause made out for the condonation of 162 days' delay in filing the
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
1-NMW.328.2017.doc
review petition, it is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of accordingly.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. C. Dharmadikari
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
