Disposed

Meenanath Fatarpekar v. Micro Strategy India Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC22 Nov 2017NMS/56/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court, by consent of parties, appointed Mr.Jehangir Jejeebhoy as sole arbitrator to continue the pending arbitration on the employment contract, with fees shared equally, filing disclosure per SA 1996, and resuming from the previous stage.

What did the court decide?

Appointed Mr.Jehangir Jejeebhoy as sole arbitrator; fees shared equally; must file disclosure per SA 1996; resume from previous stage.

Meenanath Fatarpekar Vs Micro Strategy India Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

NMS56.17-66

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.56 OF 2017 IN

¶5

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.270 OF 2016

¶6

Mr.Meenanath Fatarpekar )….Applicant V/s.

¶7

MicroStrategy India Pvt. Ltd. )....Respondent

¶8

Mr.Meenanath Fatarpekar-applicant in person. Mr.Roshan Pinto i/by Kochhar and Co.for respondent.

¶9

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 22.11.2017

¶10

P.C.:-

¶11

1 For reasons mentioned in the affidavit in support, Arbitration Application No.270 of 2016 stands restored. Notice of Motion disposed accordingly.

¶12

2 Though not listed, by consent, Arbitration Application No.270 of 2016 is taken up for hearing.

¶13

3 Mr.Fatarpekar-applicant who is present in person and Mr.Pinto appearing for respondent jointly request that arbitrator be appointed to take over from the stage at which the earlier arbitrator Shri Salil Shah has left. Mr.Fatarpekar and Mr.Pinto state that they will share arbitrator's expenses including fees and same could be

NMS56.17-66

2/2

made cost in arbitral proceeding. Mr.Fatarpekar and Mr.Pinto also state that they shall endeavour to prosecute the arbitration proceeding expeditiously. Therefore, by consent, the following order is passed.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(a) Mr.Jehangir Jejeebhoy, an advocate practicing in this court, having his office at 29/29A, Alli Chambers, N.M.Road, Fort, Mumbai400 030, Mobile No.9820395211, Email : [email protected], is appointed as sole arbitrator to arbitrate on all disputes/differences, including counter claim, if any, arising out of or in connection with or in relation to employment contract dated 2.7.2012 entered into between the applicant and respondent;

¶20

(b) The fees, administrative expenses, typing charges and venue charges if any, to be shared equally between the parties and the same will be cost in the arbitral proceeding ;

¶21

(c) Within 3 weeks of receiving a copy of the order either from the applicant or respondent, the arbitrator shall file disclosure in writing as required under Section 11(8) read with section 12(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, directly with the parties ;

¶22

(d) Arbitrator shall begin from the stage at which the earlier arbitrator had left ;

¶23

(e) Application accordingly, disposed.

¶24

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)

¶25

Meenanath Fatarpekar v. Micro Strategy India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meenanath Fatarpekar v. Micro Strategy India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Krishna Valley Corporation Vs M/S Maneesh Pharmaceuticlas Private Limited Cin U24230MH1985PLC036952

G. M. Construction, through Prop. Vinodkumar Baliram Prasad Vs Crest Logistics and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Cin No. U40101MH2004PTC146486

Ahmedabad Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Crest Logistics and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Cin No. U40101MH2004PTC146486

Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. Vs Mr.Prabhakar S. Bhadke and M/S. Anupama P. Bhadke

Steel Chamber of India Vs Kalamboli Weighbridge Private Limited

The Central Board of Trustees Vs the Official Liquidator of Chemiequip Ltd.