Disposed

Steel Chamber of India v. Kalamboli Weighbridge Private Limited

Bombay HC22 Nov 2017CARBP/547/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Commercial Division appointed Simil Purohit as sole arbitrator who had expired earlier arbitrator. Court issued directions regarding fees and disclosure. Liberty provided to petitioners to approach the Alibag court regarding jurisdiction. Petition disposed of. Application (L) No.965 of 2017 also stood disposed.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Simil Purohit as sole arbitrator; direction to arbitratior to file disclosure within 3 weeks; liberty to apply to Alibag court regarding jurisdiction; disposal of Application (L) No

Steel Chamber of India Vs Kalamboli Weighbridge Private Limited — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

CARBPL477.17-52

¶2

1/3

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

¶4

COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO.477 OF 2017

¶5

Steel Chamber of India )….Petitioners

¶6

V/s. M/s.Kalamboli Weighbridge Private Ltd. )....Respondents

¶7

Mr.Piyush Raheja i/by Pratibh Mehta for petitioners. Mr.Dharam Jumani a/w Mr.Kiran Mohite and Ms.Ishita Shah i/by Kiran Mohite for respondents.

¶8

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 22.11.2017

¶9

P.C.:-

¶10

1 By consent, following order is passed :-

¶11

ORDER

¶12

(a) Mr.Simil Purohit, an advocate practicing in this court, having his office at 60, Ali Chambers, 5^th Floor, Tamrind Lane, Opp.Ankur Restaurant, Fort, Mumbai-400 023, Telephone no.22664847, Mobile No.9821425015, is appointed as sole arbitrator in place of earlier sole arbitrator Mr.Justice S.R.Shah (retired) who after entering into reference, has expired ;

¶13

(b) The Arbitrator to continue from the stage at which it was last before the earlier arbitrator ;

2/3 CARBPL477.17-52

charges and venue charges shall be shared equally between the parties and the same will be cost in the arbitral proceeding ;

¶18

(d) Within 3 weeks of receiving a copy of this order either from the advocates for petitioners or for respondents, the learned Arbitrator shall file with the parties, disclosure in writing as required under Section 11(8) read with section 12(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996;

¶19

(e) All rights and contentions of parties are kept open ;

¶20

2 Mr.Raheja for petitioners states that in view of respondents' filing an appeal under Section 37 of the said Act before the Alibag court impugning an order passed by the earlier arbitrator under Section 17 of the said Act, Alibag court had called for record & proceedings from the arbitrator. Mr.Raheja states that directions be passed to Alibag court to return those documents if the earlier arbitrator has forwarded the same to the Alibag court.

¶21

3 Liberty to petitioners to apply to Alibag court for necessary

CARBPL477.17-52

3/3

orders. It is clarified that this court has not expressed any opinion as

¶26

to whether Alibag court has jurisdiction or otherwise.

¶27

Petition disposed.

¶28

4 In view of the above order, Application (L) No.965 of 2017 also stands disposed.

¶29

Mr.Raheja states that copy of this application will be provided to respondents within two weeks from today.

¶30

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)

¶31

Steel Chamber of India v. Kalamboli Weighbridge Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Steel Chamber of India v. Kalamboli Weighbridge Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Krishna Valley Corporation Vs M/S Maneesh Pharmaceuticlas Private Limited Cin U24230MH1985PLC036952

G. M. Construction, through Prop. Vinodkumar Baliram Prasad Vs Crest Logistics and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Cin No. U40101MH2004PTC146486

Ahmedabad Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Crest Logistics and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Cin No. U40101MH2004PTC146486

Meenanath Fatarpekar Vs Micro Strategy India Pvt. Ltd.

Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. Vs Mr.Prabhakar S. Bhadke and M/S. Anupama P. Bhadke

The Central Board of Trustees Vs the Official Liquidator of Chemiequip Ltd.