The High Court of Bombay granted leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent to file a commercial suit against a defendant residing outside Mumbai. The petition was made absolute.
Leave granted; Petition made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-LPETN22-17.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION LEAVE PETITION NO. 22 OF 2017
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT (L) NO. 36 OF 2017
Pembridge Associates Ltd…Plaintiffs
Versus
MD Ashraf Ali Khan…Defendant
Mr Sachin Mahadik, Pranav Sampat, JS Khattar & Arundhati, i/b
Khaitan & Co, for the Plaintiffs.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:21st March 2017
PC:-
1.The proposed Suit is a money claim. The Defendant resides
outside Mumbai. I am satisfied that with leave granted under Clause
XII of the Letters Patent this Court would have jurisdiction to
entertain and try the Suit.
2. Leave granted. The Petition is made absolute.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
21st March 2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave of the Court is required for filing the suit against a defendant residing outside Mumbai and if so, whether it ought to be granted.
Pembridge Associates Ltd
MD Ashraf Ali Khan
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court