Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Arbitration Petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Costs weren't awarded.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-CARBPL104-17.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 104 OF 2017
Zigma International…Petitioner
Versus
Surendra Overseas (Panama) Inc & Ors…Respondents
Mr Ashwin Shankar, with Bimal Rajsekhar, for the Petitioner.
Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate, i/b .Bose & Mitra & Co, for
Respondent No.1
Mr Shyam Kapadia, i/b BRUS Chambers, for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:20th March 2017
PC:-
1.After some hearing Mr Shankar for the Petitioner seeks leave
to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file fresh proceedings against
Respondent No. 1, if maintainable and permissible in law and if
there is a cause of action. He also states that as regards his cargo on
board vessel ABJ Jai which is presently at Chittagong, Bangladesh,
the Petitioners will make appropriate application to the court in
Bangaladesh for release of their cargo from any claim or lien sought
to be exercised by any of the Respondents.
Page 1 of 2
20th March 2017
24-CARBPL104-17.DOC
2. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with these observations. No order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
20th March 2017
Zigma International
Surendra Overseas (Panama) Inc
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court