Leave petition to file an ordinary original civil suit for money recovery was admitted. The Court held it had jurisdiction despite defendants being situated outside Mumbai and granted leave absolutely.
Leave granted to file the suit; the petition is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-LPETN21-17.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAVE PETITION NO. 21 OF 2017
Shah Coal Pvt Ltd
Versus
Rai Ispat Pvt Ltd
…Petitioner
…Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:24th March 2017
PC:-
1. The proposed Suit is a money recovery Suit. The Defendants have their offices outside Mumbai. I am satisfied that with leave granted this Court would have the jurisdiction to entertain and try the Suit.
2. Leave granted. The Petition is made absolute.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
24th March 2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain a money recovery suit against defendants whose offices are outside Mumbai.
Whether leave to file an ordinary original civil suit should be granted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shah Coal Pvt Ltd
Rai Ispat Pvt Ltd
G. S. PATEL, J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court