Unilever Plc. and Anr. v. Kidds Ice Creams Factory
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bombay High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, dismissed the defendant's trademark applications and awarded the defendant to the Naam Foundation. The defendant submitted to the decree.
What did the court decide?
Defendant to pay Rs. 50,000 costs to Naam Foundation; sealed goods to be destroyed by defendant within 12 weeks; Court Receiver discharged.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Unilever Plc & Anr v Kidds Ice Cream Factory
919-SL139-17+.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 139 OF 2017
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 478 OF 2017 WITH
LEAVE PETITION NO. 82 OF 2017
Unilever PLC & Anr
Versus
Kidds Ice Creams Factory
…Plaintiffs
…Defendant
Ms Akshata Kamath, i/b WS Kane & Co., for the Plaintiffs.
Mr A Devakumar, Proprietor of the Defendant, in person.
Mrs RS Gulekar, Section Officer from the Office of the Court Receiver,
is present.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:24th March 2017
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant the plaintiff's prayers for injunction and other reliefs.
Coram
G. S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court