Single judge allowed condonation of delay of 134 days in filing an appeal against conviction, finding sufficient cause shown.
Condoned delay of 134 days in filing appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2017
IN
STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 135 OF 2017
SRINIVAS GAURAMKONDU, PRESENTLY AT COLVALE JAIL., ... Applicant Versus STATE THR. P.P., ... Respondent
None for the Applicant. Mr. S. R. Rivankar, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/State.
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. Date:14th March, 2017
Order:
This application is filed by the applicant for condonation of delay of 134 days in filing the appeal.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
ap/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause for a delay of 134 days in filing an appeal against conviction is shown.
SRINIVAS GAURAMKONDU
STATE THR. P.P.
ANOOP V MOHTA
NUTAN D SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
