High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed a criminal revision application challenging the discharge of accused persons by the Children's Court for an offense involving obscene electronic data and insult to modesty.
Criminal Revision Application dismissed; discharge order of respondents maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2016
STATE, THR. CURCHOREM POLICE STATION. ... Petitioner Versus MANOJ KUMAR SINGH SOLANKI AND ANR. ... Respondent
Mr. S. R. Rivankar, Public Prosecutor for the applicant.
Mr. Arun De Sa, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:18th January, 2017
P.C.
Heard Shri Rivankar, the learned Public Prosecutor for the applicant and Shri De Sa, the learned Counsel for respondent no.1.
CRIR/35/2016
2
CRIR/35/2016
3
respondents.
CRIR/35/2016
4
justified to discharge the accused (See YOGESH @ SACHIN JAGDISH JOSHI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA; [2008 ALL MR (Cri.) 3222 (SC)]).
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the discharge petition of the accused is liable to be set aside.
Whether the Children's Court erroneously discharged the accused for lack of sufficient ground to proceed under Section 227 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Yogesh @ Sachin Jagdish Joshi vs. State of MaharashtraReferred¶6
YOGESH @ SACHIN JAGDISH JOSHI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA; [2008 ALL MR (Cri.) 3222 (SC)]
4 provisions across 4 enactments
STATE, THR. CURCHOREM POLICE STATION
MANOJ KUMAR SINGH SOLANKI
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
